Scramble Messageboard

Today, I found the following USAF photos, "brand-new" released on the public website of the 455th AEW, Bagram AB, Afghanistan: http://www.bagram.afnews.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/080311-F-6228L-638.JPG" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.bagram.afnew...

Please remember Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:44 as i know that Kandahar is also expecting some USMC assets.. (Harriers, CH-46, AH-1's and 2 KC-130J's) The Hercs already arrived.. there will be a total of 24 (USMC) aircraft stationed at this field. Known sofar are KC-130J's 166380/BH-380 and 166381/BH-381 As ...

Hi all, we do not think that Spang received 8 new F-16 until today but only six! Confirmed deliverys are 10361 and 10349 as RETRO88/89 on 18.1. and 10358 and 10366 on 19.3. We think that the delivery on 28.1. did not take place. Confirmed delivery on 10.2. were unidentified Retro78/79 from KFFO to ...

Thanks for sharing, Johnny! BTW: 91-0360 in your first shot is also a former Cannon Viper (ex 522nd FS, like the other two new ones). Yes, I know, but this was not my first photo with SP code. Johnny! Would you provide us your very first shots of 91-0360 in their new Spang outfit? That would be ver...

Thanks for sharing, Johnny! BTW: 91-0360 in your first shot is also a former Cannon Viper (ex 522nd FS, like the other two new ones).

Very interesting, René! Any serial numbers? And on which day they departed Shaw last month? Looks to me like exercises. For 2006 see: http://www.shaw.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123018980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I will tell you: Mark does a great job in case of Moron "Coronet East" logs! He supported me again and again to document F-16 OIF deployments to Balad AB, Iraq, for my Balad topic on http://www.f-16.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. And I wish that his topic get...

News is dropping in again......pfff Lajes is expecting, 17th March 4 EA-6B's 18th March 6x Harrier, possible USMC :shock: :shock: A swap of AV-8B Harriers is currently expected by elements of VMA-542 "Tigers" (MAG-14, 2nd MAW), MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina (tailcode WH), deployed to ...

hi, Another 12 Hornets where traveling trough Lajes this week. They arrived on Monday and departed today. Unfortunately no serials, no pics and no futher details this time !!! :cry: Adiosso George p.s. They had CE codes on the tails, which makes them VMFA-225 examples. As I already announced some d...

The three A-10s (81-0960, 81-0965 and 82-0646) are really former 118th FS / 103rd FW jets. With the BRAC 2005 process, the "Flying Yankees" lost their "Hogs" and got C-21s. According to the latest "Yankee Courier", the 103rd FW will become the 103rd AW on April 1, 2008 ...

Sorry, Oscar 01! But please understand: Meanwhile, all USAF fighter/attack aircraft packages (like F-15Es, F-16s and A-10s) are on scheduled 120-day (four-month) OIF/OEF combat deployments - all related to curent USAF´s AEF cycle rotations! Which "Hogs" you will greet at Spang late next we...

According to a single U.S. news media article (Source: http://www.wtoc.com/global/story.asp?s=7894248" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;), VMFA-115 "Silver Eagles", MCAS Beaufort, South Carolina, MAG-31, 2nd MAW, is preparing to deploy to Iraq for OIF. It looks to me ...

Morning, Good luck if you go there next thursday. You always see interesting stuff overthere. But keep in mind that 24 a/c are still deployed. 12 A-10s to return early march 12 F-16s not to return before April Regards, Oscar At least from my personal viewpoint, you will have a "full house"...

well, J.J., just forgot to add the "r" next to 91-0338 wich belived to be read off as such, now obviously have some doubts that this is correct....anyway some guys here have taken shoots of all four Vipers, so I will confirm the right serials for 338 as soon as I will chek theirs slides. ...

[...] Four F-16s arrived at Aviano last wednesday: 91-0418b, 91-0343r, 91-0338, 91-0351r as Cube 71-74, departed to ETAD yesterday afternoon as Sting 01-04. Thanks, Maurizio! But are you really sure in case of 91-0338? At least in my eyes it could be an error or typo. From another reliable source, ...