Sion June 25/26/29 2009

[Eagledriver 32]

A Log can be found here: http://www.scramble.nl/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=53729" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;













greetz Ewald

[RogierV]

Hi Ewald,

Always nice to see these nice aircraft in their beautiful home country. I hope you don't mind if I give some comments on your pictures? It is meant as a positive feedback to improve your skills. If you don't appreciate it, please let me know.

Overall your pictures are a bit dark and not really sharp. In some pics it looks as if the outer area of your lens is soft (e.g. the left hand side of your Vampire J-1197 shot). I don't know what kind of lens you use, but the Sigma 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 I used had the same 'characteristic'. This lower price end lenses perform better with a smaller aperture (higher f number), provided the light conditions allow.

For example your taxi shot of J-3079 (at 400 iso, F/11 and 1/500s) looks much better! (The position of the sun also helps there).

Keep them posting!

Rogier

[nhoogenboom]

A Log can be found here: http://www.scramble.nl/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=53729" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Log can now be found HERE

Gr.Niels

[Eagledriver 32]

Overall your pictures are a bit dark and not really sharp. In some pics it looks as if the outer area of your lens is soft (e.g. the left hand side of your Vampire J-1197 shot). I don't know what kind of lens you use, but the Sigma 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 I used had the same 'characteristic'. This lower price end lenses perform better with a smaller aperture (higher f number), provided the light conditions allow.

For example your taxi shot of J-3079 (at 400 iso, F/11 and 1/500s) looks much better! (The position of the sun also helps there).

Thanks for your comment, I use the Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3. I know what the problems are with that lens. I ordered this week the Canon 100-400 L. So after some time I hope to make (post) much better pictures.


Groet Ewald