 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
100% Agreed, Nice start on the forum and welcome!Thermal wrote:Some nice pics you got there, well done. And welcome to the board. Only a small suggestion: try to upload your pictures in a slightly smaller size. These are a little bit to big to watch
And in the future I will downsize my pics a little bit more.. 
Well.. I have a big screen. A 1024*768 does look quite small on my screenjvth007 wrote:Thanks Guys, I am glad you liked it.
Then you have to think about all those who have 1280 pix wide screens or less! and besides, 1024 brings the best picture quality.Boudewijn van Oirschot wrote:I like your shots, certainly!
Well.. I have a big screen. A 1024*768 does look quite small on my screenjvth007 wrote:Thanks Guys, I am glad you liked it.
I was wondering the same thing, anyone with info on this?jeffreyklm wrote:Wow! Suddenly I noticed the ammount of stress on the lower fuselage of both 757s! Look at all those bumps..
(I mean Picture 2 and 7!!)
Kind regards, Jeffrey.
I have!Derice wrote:I was wondering the same thing, anyone with info on this?jeffreyklm wrote:Wow! Suddenly I noticed the ammount of stress on the lower fuselage of both 757s! Look at all those bumps..
(I mean Picture 2 and 7!!)
Kind regards, Jeffrey.
2 birds with the same type of bumpy fuselage. That normal?
/klm.gif)
You can also find a lot of 747's with buckled airframes.jeffreyklm wrote:Aircrafts like 747-200's seem to have less noticable stress because they make long flights, not much changes in pressure on the frame, because they cruise for so long.
This isn't true. Buckling occurs when a frame sustains a larger stress than the ultimate stresses that the material is capable of withstanding. With other words, the frame is plastically (permanent) deforming instead of elastically.jeffreyklm wrote:It's because of the pressure changes on the fuselage during the short flights (1 hour hops for example). And by the years it gets worse.
It's because they dont fly in stable (Stabiele) condition for long times. So it expands,schrinks,expands,schrinks all the time by the altitude!
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
