but unfortunately no Panthers or even Warhawks action,
only saw one C-17 depart....
This is a subscription only section
Want to read more? It's only €10/year.
No account yet? Just Create an account first and head to the shop
 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
actually, never heard of that one...vuurwerkreeshof wrote:Isn't it dangerous to post pics from the base itself, because they normally aren't very happy when you make pics from the base itself?
.... and what about google maps? You can see a lot of infrastructure and fighterplanes in front of HAS. Or do you mean just take as many pictures as you feel like but just don' t publish the photos on the Internet?They are not so happy if you can clearly see the infrastructure off the base. Same go's for Ram(m)stein.
Compare the Google Maps map to the actually situation. The images are very old.....btw, all the A-10's are back on deck since yesterday.Hornet69 wrote:.... and what about google maps? You can see a lot of infrastructure and fighterplanes in front of HAS. Or do you mean just take as many pictures as you feel like but just don' t publish the photos on the Internet?They are not so happy if you can clearly see the infrastructure off the base. Same go's for Ram(m)stein.
Grtz,
warthog64 wrote:don't want to cause any problems for me or anybody,
so I removed the 'infra" pic's...
.....Hmm... let's not forget a different perspective as well; if Scramble (magazine and website) would only include stuff that authorities like or approve off we would have to skip A LOT! The discussion about infrastructure is old, very old. But, if I look at Airliners.net, or type on a simple search string in Google I am overwhelmed with pictures that include a lot of infrastructure. And still, after all these years, it is still possible to take pictures at these places.attila.szabo wrote:If one makes this pictures (1 + 4) it's for themselves, it is your own decision.
But posting them could be a problem for all aviation photographers!
Let's respect them who's jobs it is to "watch" us, if we "behave" we can enjoy our hobby longer...
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/jasdf.gif)