Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

ImageDedicated forum to share your own recent photos with the rest of the community.
Please note large files may exist here before you start browsing!

Forum rules
ImageThis is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum.
Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post.
In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.).

Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so.
Post Reply
User avatar
wild weasel
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1455
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:40
Type of spotter: picked up my old hobby!
Subscriber Scramble: wild weasel

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by wild weasel »

Thanks guys, glad you appreciate them.......

@ Tomba: indeed it seems the TC works okay.....and concerning Andras, i agree, he should come more often. Next time we'll even take the barbecue :mrgreen:
Shoot first, edit later! :-)
Top
User avatar
Andras
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1108
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 11:18
Type of spotter: Photo only
Location: Bearing 210 from EHLW 70 NM
Contact:
Contact Andras

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by Andras »

Very nice work all, had a great few hours with you guys, your shots look very good Menno, tip top..! I'll try and come more often, 8 months is too much of a rest period..hahaha! I'll post a few later if i can find any good ones ;-) Thanks for the company!
Groet,

Andras Brandligt
My images at AirTeamImages.com
Top
User avatar
Pancake
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 460
Joined: 30 Jan 2008, 16:51
Type of spotter: F 1
Location: Near to HSD

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by Pancake »

Very nice set of pictures, gentleman. !
I like the style of 14 & 15, from Menno.
Regards,
Johan
MY PERSONEL GALLERY AT PLANESPOTTERS.NET
Nikon D90 + Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di VC USD
Top
User avatar
Bendavid2
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 455
Joined: 11 Dec 2008, 20:04

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by Bendavid2 »

I was also at AMS for a nice sunrise. Since the forecast was bad, I just gave it a try. I was out there to suprise the girlfriend of my little brother.

I also met Tyno (from Holland). We where at the same point at the polderbaan. So some fewer pictures than normal.

1.
Image
SPL7 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
2.
Image
SPL1 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
3. I heared something about that the contract of this plane won´t be extend......
Image
SPL4 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
4. And as a suprise the girlfriend came with a 757-300!
Image
SPL5 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
My pictures at flickr
My pictures at Airliners.net
Top
User avatar
wild weasel
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1455
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:40
Type of spotter: picked up my old hobby!
Subscriber Scramble: wild weasel

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by wild weasel »

Andras wrote:Very nice work all, had a great few hours with you guys, your shots look very good Menno, tip top..! I'll try and come more often, 8 months is too much of a rest period..hahaha! I'll post a few later if i can find any good ones ;-) Thanks for the company!
Thanks Johan, thought i might try something different.......

@ Andras: Cheers mate, TC does it well so far, curious what it will do without all those iritating heatwaves :mrgreen: . You should come with us more often indeed, is good fun and joy! hope to see you see soon again...

Menno
Shoot first, edit later! :-)
Top
User avatar
Andras
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1108
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 11:18
Type of spotter: Photo only
Location: Bearing 210 from EHLW 70 NM
Contact:
Contact Andras

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by Andras »

Ok, here a few shots of last Friday. Tested the 7D with the 400mm 5.6 and a few shots with a 20-35mm 2.8 The 3200 ISO shots surprised me although i do not think it is very usefull.

@ Menno, hope i can go more often, but we will have to see...:)

1.
Image

2. Only the left wingtip is sharp
Image

3. 3 ship..
Image

4.
Image

5.
Image

6.
Image

7. Arty edit
Image

8.
Image

9.
Image

10. Super twinkle ;-)
Image

11.
Image

12.
Image

13. 1/50 panning shot, non IS 400mm, backlit, just handheld ;-)
Image

14. 20-35mm 2.8 lens used here
Image

15. The 3200 ISO shot, i think it sucks ;-/ Haven't shot a lot at night so i think this could be far better... What do you guys think?
Image

Feel free to comment please..
Groet,

Andras Brandligt
My images at AirTeamImages.com
Top
User avatar
wild weasel
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1455
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:40
Type of spotter: picked up my old hobby!
Subscriber Scramble: wild weasel

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by wild weasel »

Some nice panning shots buddy, certainly considering the EXIF :wink:

I like the MD-11 shot too by the way...
Shoot first, edit later! :-)
Top
User avatar
tomba2247
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1245
Joined: 25 Nov 2009, 12:15
Type of spotter: militair/Civil
Location: Haarlem
Contact:
Contact tomba2247

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by tomba2247 »

Nice shots Andras,, funny post on the panning shot :M-): :freak:
nr4 is my winner!! well done.
Top
User avatar
Andras
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1108
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 11:18
Type of spotter: Photo only
Location: Bearing 210 from EHLW 70 NM
Contact:
Contact Andras

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by Andras »

TY, preciate it...:)

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Groet,

Andras Brandligt
My images at AirTeamImages.com
Top
User avatar
wild weasel
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1455
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:40
Type of spotter: picked up my old hobby!
Subscriber Scramble: wild weasel

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by wild weasel »

Andras wrote:TY, preciate it...:)

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Well, as far as my knowledge goes (and i have to be carefull now, cause you really have loads of knowledge considering PP), i say yes, S RAW will not give you the full amount of "space" compared to a full size RAW file, but i might be totally wrong here, so please correct me if i'm wrong.... :wink:
Shoot first, edit later! :-)
Top
User avatar
Andras
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1108
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 11:18
Type of spotter: Photo only
Location: Bearing 210 from EHLW 70 NM
Contact:
Contact Andras

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by Andras »

wild weasel wrote:
Andras wrote:TY, preciate it...:)

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Well, as far as my knowledge goes (and i have to be carefull now, cause you really have loads of knowledge considering PP), i say yes, S RAW will not give you the full amount of "space" compared to a full size RAW file, but i might be totally wrong here, so please correct me if i'm wrong.... :wink:
Hahaha, that's too much credit, dunno if it's true so correcting you is impossible without the knowing ;)

But, my guess is leaning towards your answer too.. I thought about it the last few days and I have to test it out, so Friday evening will be test evening again. :)

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Groet,

Andras Brandligt
My images at AirTeamImages.com
Top
User avatar
wild weasel
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1455
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:40
Type of spotter: picked up my old hobby!
Subscriber Scramble: wild weasel

Re: Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

Post by wild weasel »

Andras wrote:
wild weasel wrote:
Andras wrote:TY, preciate it...:)

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Well, as far as my knowledge goes (and i have to be carefull now, cause you really have loads of knowledge considering PP), i say yes, S RAW will not give you the full amount of "space" compared to a full size RAW file, but i might be totally wrong here, so please correct me if i'm wrong.... :wink:
Hahaha, that's too much credit, dunno if it's true so correcting you is impossible without the knowing ;)

But, my guess is leaning towards your answer too.. I thought about it the last few days and I have to test it out, so Friday evening will be test evening again. :)

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
That's nice, count me in :mrgreen:
Shoot first, edit later! :-)
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Photo Forum”