FWIT Leeuwarden

ImageDedicated forum to share your own recent photos with the rest of the community.
Please note large files may exist here before you start browsing!

Forum rules
ImageThis is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum.
Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post.
In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.).

Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so.
Post Reply
Poldriver
Scramble Rookie
Scramble Rookie
Posts: 64
Joined: 17 Sep 2010, 11:51
Type of spotter: Mil
Subscriber Scramble: Poldriver

FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by Poldriver »

Still testing my new D300s.. Still not very satisfied.. Probably one of the biggest issue will be the fact i'm still using the old 'analog' 70-300!

Any tips or advices about the camera are moren than welcome.. C&C about the pics also offcourse..

Anyway.. FWIT this morning.. Some EPAF 'friends'.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Triple Nickel
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 681
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 20:12
Location: Laarbruch Final
Contact:

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by Triple Nickel »

Do you shoot RAW or JPG?

What do you do to edit them?

Those r the main quetions for now... 8)
Poldriver
Scramble Rookie
Scramble Rookie
Posts: 64
Joined: 17 Sep 2010, 11:51
Type of spotter: Mil
Subscriber Scramble: Poldriver

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by Poldriver »

Triple Nickel wrote:Do you shoot RAW or JPG?

What do you do to edit them?

Those r the main quetions for now... 8)
RAW only.. Editing is with Lightroom.. Not much actually.. playing a bit with the levels, contrast, denoise and sharpen a tiny bit.. Nothing more! The camera is superb.. Very accurate and fast, but still the images maintain blurry en sometimes way of focus.. Also i see too many noise mostly in the lighter area's, shot's taken at 200 iso.. This camera should be "free'" of noise under the 800 iso.. I'm gonna test the body in a short period of time with a Nikkor 70-200 VRII 2.8, If that give's the same result.. I eat the d**n thing..
User avatar
topgun1984
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1229
Joined: 08 Mar 2007, 06:45
Type of spotter: A non cursing 4RTY F4RTY
Location: Gorinchem
Contact:

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by topgun1984 »

Perhaps you have a low shutterspeed? by the judge of the Herc that's a reason why it's unsharp. There is almost no contrast in your pictures also. Never put the lens wide open, take it a few steps down to f9 ~ f11 that would inprove your sharpness. Also try to underexpose a little bit this will improve your handling in raw..

These are my 2 pennies
YOU DON'T NEED WHITE LENSES IF YOU GOT A WHITE CAMERA.
Image
Sanderm
Scramble Newbie
Scramble Newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 09:51
Type of spotter: Military Photographer
Location: Opheusden

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by Sanderm »

Yes, it has to do with your camera settings. The first picture you use a shutter speed of 1/640 in the second photo you use a shutterspeed of 1/800 you can see that this picture is sharper already. Try to keep your shutter speed not lower than 1/1000 or even 1/1250.
Poldriver
Scramble Rookie
Scramble Rookie
Posts: 64
Joined: 17 Sep 2010, 11:51
Type of spotter: Mil
Subscriber Scramble: Poldriver

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by Poldriver »

Aperture did not went below 6.3.. Higher is sharper, but the weather didn't played along for that actually.. wanted to keep my shutterspeed high also! Used f8 and also f11, but didn't helped really.. I will post some when i've tried the other lens..

Thanx for the replies anyway! :toppie:
User avatar
attila.szabo
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 456
Joined: 15 Jan 2006, 10:25
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: ja
Location: The Netherlands

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by attila.szabo »

Poldriver wrote:Still testing my new D300s.. Still not very satisfied.. Probably one of the biggest issue will be the fact i'm still using the old 'analog' 70-300! Any tips or advices about the camera are moren than welcome.. C&C about the pics also offcourse..
Hee Poldriver,

I also have a Nikon D300s, look on the net for the pdf-file "Nikon D300s Setup Guide", this guide will give you different setups, like Landscape, Portrait or Sports and Action photography, you can program it in to your camera and quit sure that the setup for "Sports and Action photography" is the one you will like for aviation purposes... try (http://www.outthereimages.com/images/D3 ... _Guide.pdf)
I did... and i'm happy with it, off-course some settings I changed to my own lickings!

Goodluck :bthumb:

Let us know if it worked for you!
Last edited by attila.szabo on 18 Jul 2012, 19:07, edited 1 time in total.
grtz. Attila the Hun.

Nikonian
Photo58nl
User avatar
Glidepath
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1915
Joined: 25 Mar 2006, 12:04

Re: FWIT Leeuwarden

Post by Glidepath »

hi,

i suggest you try this:
Have a pro match the new camera with your lens. Think these might be off by one or two steps. Fine tuning.....
or / and
if the lens is IS / VR, have that stabilizer unit checked (also).

succes
Hoera d'revolutie, 't is eindelijk zover', maar de nwe leiders blijken net zo autoritair
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Photo Forum”