 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
I like those two 747s. And I think you did well on the wide angle. I don't find it aesthetic, but it does show the 737 was very low overhead.Gonzo wrote:Comments are welcom but please be gentle.
I doGonzo wrote:I hope you like
And the numbers 12 and 3 are placed in the right order of best second best imo 
Just do itDiarto wrote:Thanks Martijn! Now I look at it it would have been nicer to take it from the wingtip all the way across the wing. Next time!
What the hell; try & error is the best part of photography 
)
/freeflight.gif)
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/garuda.gif)
