Scramble Messageboard

mosquitq wrote:How long has Heathrow been a city?

For ages ....
However due to it 's climate resident prefer not to live their for too long ...

And these are all visible? Not parked inside a warehouse or so.

R20356 inbound ETAD (ads-b)

R20428, R20458 and R20416
Seem to pass ETAR according FR UK App
R20386 towards ETAR.
R20679 and R20402 inbound ETNN.

AK01 wrote:The end of Waalhaven NZ (noordzijde). Where the Sluisjesdijk starts.

Would the Bartel Wiltonkade be a viable optioneel too? ( not familiar in R'dam )

And what about the ones from the 26th? Gone or are these included, excluding CH-47F.

Not according the article. The total amount of personal mentioned also indicates force wide. Then again there is no real need to keep frontline forces in Germany, moving them closer to the front might even reduce the need for deployments such as the upcoming one from usar. Maintaining Ramstein and W...

Wow!

evhest wrote:On the other hand, rumours of SP jets moving elsewhere were always around and this is the first concrete mention of doing so.

To my opinion this would certainly make sence as well as moving RAF Lakenheath jets. In that sentence Spangdahlem might just as well close.

But again, time will telll.

As said before, Trumps has ssid such things before regarding other areas where no reduction has taken place at least not in relation to his "words" .
So time will tell.

Thnx

Source? It seems that (ads-b) a KC-10 and a MC-130 are orbiting the area.

It sure is a nice field, some great mil activity.
Too bad it' s on the wrong side of the pond ...

Osprey66 wrote:

Stratofreighter wrote:...perhaps merge this topic with
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=151619 ?

merge is quite an understatement for redundancy

Someone for the 'routing' in between EHGR and Reading?

More likely to be one of the F - models flying stateside.

Great!
May i vote for the 31st Fw jets to be exchanged with the 52nd Fw jets