Scramble Messageboard

Hi Eric, on 14 July we noted the following RS C/130´s: 15-5822/RS C-130J-30 37 AS 07-4635/RS C-130J-30 37 AS invasion stripes 04-3142/RS C-130J-30 37 AS 15-5831/RS C-130J-30 37 AS 07-8608/RS C-130J-30 37 AS invasion stripes 07-8614/RS C-130J-30 37 AS 07-8609/RS C-130J-30 37 AS invasion stripes 06-86...

michel N wrote:Wrong forum and wrong serial. 54+34 was delivered last month. Today should have been the 54+33

Yeah sometimes everything goes wrong

Gerard wrote:

Maurice wrote:Inbound now, delivery of the 54+34 as GAF684

According to ADS-B GAF684 (hex-code 3f5572) is inbound Wunstorf, which actually makes sense if it is a delivery of a new A400

Of course, posted it in the wrong forum, sorry for that!

Inbound now, delivery of the 54+34 as GAF684

Really?? Is this your way of trying to attract attention to your youtube channel? There is nothing impressive in both the take off as well your sly way of crying for hits

roberto wrote:

Maurice wrote:Any activity from the local F-35's this week? Don't see them on ADSB anymore

Non flew the last 2 days and most of the time they are not visible on adsb

Thanks Roberto, that's why I asked.

Any activity from the local F-35's this week? Don't see them on ADSB anymore

Ah, ik vond de fout inmiddels zelf. Ik keek op freeradar.uk, die er hetzelfde uit ziet maar ik moet freedar.uk gebruiken, die wel de optie 'world feed' heeft.

Freedar.uk op mobiel werkt heb freedar.uk ook op pc geprobeerd. werkt op zich wel. alleen voornamelijk UK en Noordzee zichtbaar. en een RSAF A.330 in Frankrijk. Voor de rest (duitsland, spanje, italie, etc...) en rest v.d. wereld nixs zichtbaar. maw niet optimaal dus :( Heeft iemand een andere trac...

Ok, thanks

NL.Aviation wrote:GAF631 A400 (54+04) visited EIN this morning, as well as a BAF F-16BM BAF245 (FB-22) for approaches according to ADS-B

According to ADSB it was the 54+07. Did you confirm this tail number visually?

Two CF-188's arrived today at Torrejon, together with CC-150 15004 as CFC4375. Both CF-188 as CFC0203. According to flightplan, one of them is the 188927. Could anyone confirm this plus the other one? MTIA!

Ik heb geen 6D maar kan er wel iets over zeggen. 'Niet geschikt' is wel heel beperkend gezegd maar je moet er rekening mee houden dat hij niet zo'n snelle en uitgebreide autofocus heeft en wat minder beeldjes per seconde maakt dan bijvoorbeeld de 7D II, 5D IV en 1DX II etc. Doorgaans hebben deze laa...

ypenburg63 wrote:I am missing RCH253, no signs of an arriving aircraft here (GKE).

I noted it on ADSB when it was short final Geilenkirchen.

And now RCH251 (59-1512) is in the holding near Geilenkirchen at 10.000ft. Issues at Geilenkirchen?

Stephan Lodewijks wrote:Can anyone visually confirm the ID of A-400M-180 54+30 which departed Hamburg today around 1230LT?

Not visually but I can confirm this tail It was visual o/h Eindhoven right?