Scramble Messageboard

J.J., no worries. The rules on photos are complex here. This has grown over time due to users' wishes. We hope to implement a change some time this year, when hopefully switching to other software. Until then, we ask for everybody's co-operation, which is generally going very well.

Thx,
Erik

Iwan, pal 8) You see, these Aviation Photoshop Courses are good for something..... They better be! With all the promotion you are giving them, I expect nothing but top-notch Photoshoppers to emerge from those courses. So, if the simple basics of colour profiling would not be part of the course, I do...

wvanbel wrote:Some changes already

See my post on Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:36 pm.
What's new is the addition of 'new users' to that text. Once more, good to see it's there, bad it wasn't right away...


Erik

The 81st EFS is currently deployed for OEF to Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, and not for OIF to Balad AB, Iraq! Already verified by official USAF photos taken at Bagram are 81-0983 (first shot) and 81-0952 (second shot). The jet at left on the third shot looks to me like 81-0963 - also posted by Bri...

BlackBird wrote:Can't get them as used in the photoforum...

You need to use the Imageshack url that says 'Direct'. But obviously it would be a good idea to resize them before uploading

Erik

De uitleg staat nu hier en de foto's hier.

Erik

But the advantage of airfighters is; Just my personal choice Those are obviously two different things. That site being mil only means it limits its own abilities. For instance, Airfighters will likely not get me to put my photos there, because I don't limit myself to just mil. And airfighters is mu...

Martijn mailed this to me, as the board was down (again!) last night...

BCS -> 04:00A OO-DPO
SWN -> 06:02A LX-WAL
IR -> 08:25C EP-IBD
PS -> 09:00C UR-GAM
H9 -> 09:21C TC-APF
KC -> 10:00C P4-KCA

Oost: 06:44E from IAD N917VZ

Groeten Martijn

Rico, forgive my sense of humour on this one. Your question was just so obviously not the right way to ask this, I allowed myself a little joke. I do not have the answer you want, but the bare fact that debris on the runway is sometimes not seen by pilots proves what etab says in the last sentence. ...

FALCONCREST wrote:B-52D 56-0671 Brize Norton 1980

Ger wrote:The shop is also open on Sundays.

That's enough advertisement for this thread, please refrain from further promotion of specific shops.

Erik

Uiteraard, en terecht, is hierover ook veel speculatie op de A.net-forums. Ik ben er zelf nog niet helemaal uit. Ik wil best een aantal 'dom & sorry'-scenario's geloven, in combi met overbelaste personen bij Demand Media die net iets teveel 'in control' willen overkomen en daardoor onhandige (want o...

Als iemand mij daaraan kan helpen, wil ik de incidenten te allen tijde melden, uiteraard! Een nobel streven, maar bespaar je de moeite. Het is voor de ontvanger op dat moment niet te bepalen of je een 'grappenmaker' bent of serieus. Tegen de tijd dat men dat wel weet, zal het via de gangbare kanale...

Dat lijkt me eerlijk gezegd niet zo nuttig. Deze draad gaat over de ontwikkelingen, niet over een soort leedvermaak. En smeken voor acceptance kan ik me al helemaal niets bij voorstellen trouwens. Probeer maar even hoop te houden, want toen je 767 de hit was, was je maar al te blij met A.net. 8) Wel...

Nice stuff, Frank. Although the distance does give me a 'detached' feeling, you got some neat compositions in there. I like the first KC a lot! And indeed picked the right weather for this kind of work.

Erik