Crappy shot, 300mm @ F5.6, dusk... couldn't do any better.
The Evergreen 747.
![Image](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3050/3705193056_aca8ae844a.jpg)
ATC also was unfamiliar with it's callsign and had to ask for the company call sign a second time.
![Smile :)](/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Anyone have a better shot of this bird?
![]() | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
Note, English only here...Derice wrote:Vanuit mijn huis geschoten (geen tijd helaas om naar EHAM te rijden).
Ontzettend slecht shot geworden, maar ja... 300mm F5.6, schermering, Beter lukte niet.
De Evergreen 747.
ATC had blijkbaar de callsign nog niet vaak gehoord, die moest er nog een 2e keer om vragen.
Iemand een beter shot van deze kist?
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more