EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

ImageSocial talk and other non-aviation topics including photos. Note this a FUN area!

Forum rules
Image
Backtrack
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 203
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 11:59
Subscriber Scramble: Backtrack
Location: Schiedam

EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Backtrack »

This is realy sad. A airport which can't accomodate 1 small An12 due to lack of materials? How low can you ga as an airport?
User avatar
adz
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2314
Joined: 01 Dec 2003, 21:23
Type of spotter: S2
Subscriber Scramble: ja
Location: Delft

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010

Post by adz »

Backtrack wrote:This is realy sad. A airport which can't accomodate 1 small An12 due to lack of materials? How low can you ga as an airport?
Rotterdam is a small airport. I doubt if it will be financially viable to invest in material to handle An-12s at Rotterdam. The 1 time per year that it might be expected........

Gr.
Ard
# But there's no sense crying over every mistake.
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake #
chefkok
Scramble Newbie
Scramble Newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 11:27
Type of spotter: F4
Location: Schiedam

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010

Post by chefkok »

I am also very disappointed that the Antonov did go to Amsterdam.
Is there anyone that can tell what kind of special equipment was needed for this plane?
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 21914
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010

Post by Stratofreighter »

adz wrote:
Backtrack wrote:This is realy sad. A airport which can't accomodate 1 small An12 due to lack of materials? How low can you ga as an airport?
Rotterdam is a small airport. I doubt if it will be financially viable to invest in material to handle An-12s at Rotterdam. The 1 time per year that it might be expected........

Gr.
Ard
Once upon a time (in the late 1990s)... the Balkan Bulgarian Antonov An-12s could almost be considered "residents" at Rotterdam... :cry:

So yes, material was certainly available back then! :evil:

Tattle Lounge now I guess? :roll:
Last edited by Stratofreighter on 24 Mar 2010, 17:13, edited 1 time in total.
Backtrack
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 203
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 11:59
Subscriber Scramble: Backtrack
Location: Schiedam

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010

Post by Backtrack »

adz wrote:
Backtrack wrote:This is realy sad. A airport which can't accomodate 1 small An12 due to lack of materials? How low can you ga as an airport?
Rotterdam is a small airport. I doubt if it will be financially viable to invest in material to handle An-12s at Rotterdam. The 1 time per year that it might be expected........

Gr.
Ard
Don't be rediculous. The An12 was designed to operate to the most remote and/or worst equiped airports in de USSR. It's a shame that Rotterdam Airport can't accomodate such a "standard" cargo plane which needs only very basic services.
An Airport that can't accomodate/serve normal airplanes? pfffffff
I can understand if AP doesn't invest in materials to load/unload wide-body cargo jets. But i just can't imagine what kind of equipment they lack to load/unload a An12? And if they lack it. You can always hire (for example) a heavy forklift. Come on you're in the Rotterdam area, there are lots of (shipping business-related) companies who offer materials which can be hired on short notice for short-tem rentals.
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11210
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010

Post by Key »

Stratofreighter wrote:Tattle Lounge now I guess?
Yes
What four words, Jimmy!?!
User avatar
MartijnMD11
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1165
Joined: 09 Dec 2005, 10:30
Type of spotter: Civil, bizz & military transport
Location: EHRD
Contact:

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by MartijnMD11 »

An Airport that can't accomodate/serve normal airplanes? pfffffff


WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW.........just stop right there: I said the HANDLER did not have the right equipment for loading the AN12, NOT the airport. An airport is not providing equipment like stairs, highloaders, forklifts etcetera. The handler is responsible for their own equipment.
Nontheless: Rotterdam - The Hague airport gave the slots to accomodate the AN12, was it not???

Ciao, MartijnMD11
The airports' runway is the most important main street in any town!

http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... entry=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.mannenovervrouwen.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Backtrack
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 203
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 11:59
Subscriber Scramble: Backtrack
Location: Schiedam

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Backtrack »

If the (only) handler at Rotterdam airport is not able to load/unload An 12... than the only conclusion could be that the airport is not able to handle this aircraft. Which remains the most rediculous thing i've seen in years.
An airport should be able to provide very basic services to these very basic types of cargo planes. If not than you're not worhty to cary the name "airport" if you can't handle the moste simple airplanes.
User avatar
rutger330
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 935
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 08:52
Location: spijkenisse

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by rutger330 »

Backtrack wrote:If the (only) handler at Rotterdam airport is not able to load/unload An 12... than the only conclusion could be that the airport is not able to handle this aircraft. Which remains the most rediculous thing i've seen in years.
An airport should be able to provide very basic services to these very basic types of cargo planes. If not than you're not worhty to cary the name "airport" if you can't handle the moste simple airplanes.
well my opion is... in 2007 we also had some AN-12's I believe so it could be. But I don't agree with your simple aircraft, cause a AN-12 need specific things i think basic aircraft discribes more like 737F cause there was a FLYant cargo 737F and it came so and i think those are basic aircraft and AN-12 is more used as a charter aircraft and some airports cannot accomodate that but still Rotterdam is an airport cause they have the basic needs and don't forget ROTTERDAM-THE HAGUE IS NOT A REAL airport for cargo aircraft so don't blame them for not having the right equipment, Schiphol and maastricht are more cargo airports then rotterdam and the last cargo a/c was here on 14-08-2008 as said before the Flyant cargo 737F, that's my opion about it :roll:

grt rutger
kind regards,

Rutger Patterson
User avatar
Thijs
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 5074
Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 13:42
Subscriber Scramble: Thijs
Location: West Intercourse Island
Contact:

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Thijs »

The strategy of Rotterdam Airport is to be a business airport (with some charter traffic). So handling companies and other actors act to that. Why should a handling company have equipment for one or maybe two AN-12 which will visit Rotterdam in a year? To keep the spotting community satisfied. A logical decision of the handling company to withdrawn equipment which will only be used one or two times a year.

Thijs
Assume makes an ASS of U and ME.
User avatar
Aviaphotos
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2039
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 20:53
Type of spotter: F5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Contact:

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Aviaphotos »

Backtrack wrote:I can understand if AP doesn't invest in materials to load/unload wide-body cargo jets. But i just can't imagine what kind of equipment they lack to load/unload a An12? And if they lack it. You can always hire (for example) a heavy forklift. Come on you're in the Rotterdam area, there are lots of (shipping business-related) companies who offer materials which can be hired on short notice for short-tem rentals.
Sorry, but I don't agree with you at all!
Maybe the equipment AP has is not suitable for a certain size of cargo? I don't know the size of the cargo the An-12 was supposed fly to Constanta yesterday, but it seems like a good reason.
Why should AP hire equipment AND staff (because they're most likely not qualified to operate the hired equipment), just to load one Antonov 12? It's way to expensive to operate this way.
At for example AMS they have this equipment, because they handle a lot more cargo flights.

You, as an ex Servisair Rotterdam employee, should know better!

Regards,

Pim
Pim Hesse Photography - http://www.pimhesse.com
User avatar
rutger330
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 935
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 08:52
Location: spijkenisse

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by rutger330 »

I agree, sorry pim I didn't knew that :oops: but yeah it useless to do that and way to much money would be lost

grt rutger :)
kind regards,

Rutger Patterson
User avatar
James
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2340
Joined: 26 Aug 2003, 20:29
Type of spotter: NIET
Location: Almere

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by James »

I really wonder what kind of equipment U r missing in Rotterdam to handle an AN12???????
There is no eqpmnt needed besides a vorklift...or in the worst case a lowerdeck loader backwards to the a/c.
I handeled many AN12's myself so can't imagine that that was the reason that he diverted to Amsterdam.
Dind't it have anything to do with the curfew into RTM for these type of aircraft?
James
Niets maar dan ook niets is zeker in de luchtvaart
User avatar
Aviaphotos
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2039
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 20:53
Type of spotter: F5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Contact:

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Aviaphotos »

James wrote:Dind't it have anything to do with the curfew into RTM for these type of aircraft?
James
Nope, it was allowed to operate this flight, no restrictions from the Airport's side.

Regards,

Pim
Pim Hesse Photography - http://www.pimhesse.com
User avatar
Andreotti
Scramble Rookie
Scramble Rookie
Posts: 99
Joined: 01 Mar 2009, 18:08

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Andreotti »

James wrote:I really wonder what kind of equipment U r missing in Rotterdam to handle an AN12???????
There is no eqpmnt needed besides a vorklift...or in the worst case a lowerdeck loader backwards to the a/c.
James
that is really the reason, there was no equipment availeble at that moment, that's why it divirted to AMS.
why is there lock on a door of a shop which is 24/7 open?
Post Reply

Return to “Tattle Lounge”