This picture is from further away, but still a nice visitor!
Niels
This is a subscription only section
Want to read more? It's only €10/year.
No account yet? Just Create an account first and head to the shop
 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
RA-76842 IL-76TD Aviacon Zitotrans 08-03-16 eheh b by Maarten Visser, on Flickr
RA-76842 IL-76TD Aviacon Zitotrans 08-03-16 eheh cupje by Maarten Visser, on Flickr
RA-76842 IL-76TD Aviacon Zitotrans 08-03-16 eheh front by Maarten Visser, on Flickr
361 IL-76MF RJAF 08-03-16 eheh by Maarten Visser, on Flickr
361 IL-76MF RJAF 08-03-16 eheh c hdr by Maarten Visser, on Flickr
361 IL-76MF RJAF 08-03-16 eheh b by Maarten Visser, on Flickr
Thx for the updates, and with a bit walking arround on several decks of P4 the serial was visablemarcoz wrote:Yes. parked perfectly to take pictures!
I am not aware of that rule ! don' t see any problem with these pictues... (no infrastructure or else can seen on the platform if that is the issue..)Ranger wrote:I always thought there were restrictions for publishing photo's from this ramp to keep good friends with the owner?
Cheers,
Ranger
Thanks for your cooperation.mirage 69 wrote:=censored= that rule
Yeah, because we are all so =censored= entitled to get the pics we want.mirage 69 wrote:=censored= that rule Ranger.....
Grtz Rene
But I disgress here. /kras.gif)
A quick look at the pictures shown at EWAS reveal nearly identical pictures so I would not be as harsh. I'm not going to restart the discussion about the rules of the EWAS agreement however it is far from decent to react like that. Many other reply's could have been chosen with this version being the worst of them!nilsko wrote:Yeah, because we are all so =censored= entitled to get the pics we want.mirage 69 wrote:=censored= that rule Ranger.....
Grtz Rene
Nice pics!
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more