 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
lol You should review your informationBart wrote:The photo is really nicely done, but there is no CH-13. But still it was nicely done!
.
Matrix wrote:
"According to several military sources, the army eventually decided not to register the aircraft CH-14, a choice that surprised and think of superstition. It was the first time a military aircraft would not worn the number 13.
The new C-130 has been seen this week carrying the CH-14 registration. But this anomaly should be corrected before its delivery to the 15th wing of Melsbroek, provided these same sources. "
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
