 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
1
I know these extreme tele-/zoomlenses tend to cause a considerable quality reduction, especially compared with prime lenses, but still, I do see many fellow spotters using the same Sigma 50-500 but also their pictures are more crisp then mine....Maurice wrote:Hans is using a (Canon) prime lens 500/f4. This is an extremely nice and sharp lens, which your 50-500 (with all respect!) can nowhere approach. Other than that, of course with this focal length, it is of most importance to have a very very steady hand. That too can make the difference. Just my two cents.
Cheers, Maurice.
BTW Hans, I forgot: very nice set of pictures!!
Some can be a bit brighter as well, use the levels trick 
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
