 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
/reeve.gif)
That photo spot seems to have become quite popular over the last few weeks...zzark wrote:Perfect angle of the KL747 for your picture
/emirates.gif)
/luftwaffe.gif)
Again, thanx for sharingtomba2247 wrote:1/20s nice
747 shot is perfect..I love that spot to!
WhahahahanustyR wrote:Good job Martijn
Number your pictures.feikew wrote:Not really unique regs, but worth sharing in my opninion.
Any comments are welcome.
Regards
Feike
WilcoBendavid2 wrote:Number your pictures.
Thanks. It was already long exposed for a 400mm handheld shot.Bendavid2 wrote:1. Picture is very nice. Picture works a little bit better when you took the shot when the plane cross the contrast of a cloud and sunlight. Because than you can see heat from the engine better and that gives a extra touch. 1 to 2/3 stop more exposured needed.
The sun just dropped behind the CB's (as those in #1). So I thought I'd go for some panning shots. Next time I'll take the better light for sure! My lens (Canon 100-400) is at it's best sharpness @ f/9, so that's why.Bendavid2 wrote:2. A little bit to late you missed the nice light that you have in the next picture. Also this picture is a little bit to dark in my eyes. You don´t need f/9 for this kind of pictures.
I was amazed that the jumbo turned to me anyway. With some more X wind it will be better, that's for sure.Bendavid2 wrote:3. Indeed seen a lot past few days. A little bit more before sunset en the light was a little bit better. With more X-wind think about the spot again.
Thanks for the hint. I'll take it in mind.Bendavid2 wrote:4. Higher shutterspeed. If you had this picture when the cockpit pass and you had zoom in it was a shot out of a million.
That's why I underlined any. Just want to learn more! Thanks, it's what I was looking for!!Bendavid2 wrote:Please don´t think that I think you pictures are bad. But since they are very good and you ask for comment I gave you comments.
'Just' a Canon 40D / Canon 100-400. Anxious to get at least a 5DMIIBendavid2 wrote:I am very curious about your gear
Were you lining up behind the BAW A321? Then you might just be lucky.jeffreyklm wrote:I doubt it, but has anyone spotted Transavia 737-700 PH-XRZ Departing from Runway 24 around 14:45? I was up front!
Jeffrey.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/eva.gif)
