 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
Thanks, I 'll edit one more of the US 757Pancake wrote: I like this picture because:
The 757(wl) is my favorite airplane.
The fantastic shot. (angle and condensation)
Regards,
Johan
Great plane indeed, this was between 9 and 11 o'clock, a lot of fog in the morning, well, more like fog parts, sun - perfect atmosphere, but this picture looks like it's rotatedPancake wrote:I like this picture because:nustyR wrote:Just got back from a nightshoot @ EHAM, photos will follow.
3
The 757(wl) is my favorite airplane.
The fantastic shot. (angle and condensation)
Regards,
Johan
or not Matijn?Off course it's rotatedAndras wrote: but this picture looks like it's rotated
/koreanair.gif)
Comes three times a weekAviatiek wrote:No idea, whether this is a regular visitor ...
thnkx Andras - but the lens is much "slower" than the Canon EFS 55-250mm - I must get used to this oneAndras wrote:Hi Douwe, looking good with your new lens! Looks sharper than the Canon. Do you also use a calibrated monitor nowadays? If your monitor is set too dark you will want to compensate that with „overexposing” your images. Your last couple of shots all look a bit overexposed or maybe have a bit too much brightness/exposure (PS wise) put into them. If you fix that your are right on the money dude!dvdzee wrote:Hope you like 2 of mine - was there for a short wile.
Douwe
Canon EOS 1000D + Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG Macro
Greetz!
dvdzee wrote: Maybe "under-expose" the pics in the camera settings while shooting ?
Thankstomba2247 wrote:@Martijn, I like your fist one ..a lot, !! well done!
I used 'only 24mm' on a full frame for that shot 
Well, i assume you shoot RAW so you could adjust it in PS3, and normally if this is the result out of your camera, (it comes out overexposed) you could underexpose 0.5 or 1 stop like Martijn said. But if your camera detects a lot of light it would automatically underexpose so you need to "overexpose" to have a correct exposure. (That is a lot of exposure in this sentence..) Get it? it also depends on the metering your camera is set to. The 1000D doesn't have a lot of metering modes but this doesn't have to be a problem in these conditions.dvdzee wrote: thnkx Andras - but the lens is much "slower" than the Canon EFS 55-250mm - I must get used to this one
My pics are indeed a bit over-exposed; don't know if that is the monitor, but it is not calibrated (yet).
I'll give it another try today.
Maybe "under-expose" the pics in the camera settings while shooting ?
Could it be the sensitivity of the lens ? Just have it for 6 days now.
)
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
