Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B737".

ImageForum for news and discussions on miltary aviation matters.

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 21844
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B737".

Post by Stratofreighter »

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/new ... 627241.ece
THE Ministry of Defence is understood to have dropped a £2bn plan to buy a fleet of US-made submarine-hunting jets for the RAF.

The proposed purchase of up to nine P-8 Poseidon aircraft
was expected to be the centrepiece of the government’s forthcoming defence review,
but sources say the project has been shelved after ministers decided the aircraft were “fiendishly expensive”.

The move has raised fears that Britain’s four Vanguard nuclear deterrent submarines and the navy’s new £6bn aircraft carriers could be inadequately protected.

Senior retired RAF officers argued earlier this year that Britain’s nuclear deterrent has been left vulnerable after plans to update a fleet of Nimrod submarine-hunting aircraft were axed in 2010.

The defence review, due to be published later this month, was widely expected to announce a replacement for the Nimrod, with Boeing’s P-8, which carries torpedoes, depth charges, anti-ship missiles, regarded as the frontrunner.
...and in print:
https://twitter.com/NavyLookout/status/ ... 08/photo/1

Image
Airnieuws stopped, update FokkerNews.nl Mei-2024
User avatar
SquAdmin
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3734
Joined: 21 Feb 2003, 11:04
Location: C a/d Y

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by SquAdmin »

Well, you'd say this improves the odds of the Kawasaki P-1. Still have to see if Britain would actually procure Japanese weapons...
Greetz,

Patrick
User avatar
michel N
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2545
Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 14:31
Subscriber Scramble: MN

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by michel N »

There was also an offer to update the Hercules to SC-130, when the Herks are replaced by the A400. It could be a lot cheaper, since no new airframes have to be build. And, the update could be done by Marshalls of Cambridge. So don't rule out that option
flown in: Things with wings
geert99
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 105
Joined: 05 May 2009, 13:17
Type of spotter: F2
Location: Almelo
Contact:

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by geert99 »

It can't be a coincidence that the P-1's were present at the Air Tattoo. The Japaneese knew there was a possibility. I wouldn't be surprised to see the P-1's as the best candidates now.
FredL
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 513
Joined: 27 Aug 2012, 22:21

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by FredL »

michel N wrote:There was also an offer to update the Hercules to SC-130, when the Herks are replaced by the A400. It could be a lot cheaper, since no new airframes have to be build. And, the update could be done by Marshalls of Cambridge. So don't rule out that option
Cheaper ? Maybe, but not sure. Don't forget that the RAF's first option was also to "re-work" an existing aircraft, the previous MPA, the Nimrods.
After a long program, with many adaptations (reducing the number of airframes involved, etc.) and increasing costs, the plan was finally cancelled at an advanced stage and the planes scrapped.
aviodromefriend
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3519
Joined: 03 Dec 2006, 22:10
Type of spotter: zo snel afgekeurd, ik kreeg geen kans S5 te worden
Location: Airshows, EHKD, Where HAT eh took me

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by aviodromefriend »

FredL wrote:
michel N wrote:There was also an offer to update the Hercules to SC-130, when the Herks are replaced by the A400. It could be a lot cheaper, since no new airframes have to be build. And, the update could be done by Marshalls of Cambridge. So don't rule out that option
Cheaper ? Maybe, but not sure. Don't forget that the RAF's first option was also to "re-work" an existing aircraft, the previous MPA, the Nimrods.
After a long program, with many adaptations (reducing the number of airframes involved, etc.) and increasing costs, the plan was finally cancelled at an advanced stage and the planes scrapped.
That Herc offer has been made, but AFAIK was never seriously considered, as the aircraft are very worn out due to their never envisaged tempo of work.
De Zamboni heeft kramp in zijn achterwiel
Jan Maarten Smeets, Heerenveen 31 oktober 2009
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 21844
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by Stratofreighter »

If the Boeing P-8 Poseidon is considered to be "fiendishly expensive", then probaby the same applies to the Kawasaki P-1.

Okay, it is Wikipedia :roll: -and not an official document, but prices like:
US$140.8 millon to US$167 million
as quoted at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawasaki_P-1
are not really going to win over the British treasury when they already baulk at the £100 million a piece asked by Boeing... :(
Airnieuws stopped, update FokkerNews.nl Mei-2024
User avatar
Le Addeur noir
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 61364
Joined: 19 Jan 2007, 16:22
Subscriber Scramble: Nee
Location: Asie

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by Le Addeur noir »

Britain has higher spending priorities than defence.

Foreign aid takes precedence in Britain these days over merely defending the Realm.

Foreign aid is ringfenced by law. Unlike defence which can be further reduced.
Last edited by Le Addeur noir on 03 Nov 2015, 22:33, edited 1 time in total.
Drink treble
See double
Act single

and the Emir called up his jet fighters
brian25
Posts: 10
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 10:20
Type of spotter: Military
Subscriber Scramble: yes

Re: Nov2015: "Britain's MoD says NO to Boeing P-8 ASW MPA B7

Post by brian25 »

Too true
Post Reply

Return to “Military Aviation News”