ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

ImageThe forum for all movements and news on Geilenkirchen.

Forum rules
ImageMode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary
Post Reply
User avatar
Bennie
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 16435
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!

ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by Bennie »

Inbound: RCH830. Is this the bird that diverted to Spang?
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
Oscar01
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2886
Joined: 24 Feb 2003, 11:26
Location: Ede

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by Oscar01 »

No, he's comming straight from US.

The one at Spang was IL ang and came in fromt he east, was planned for Mildenhall, but due to crosswinds, diverted.

Oz
mainsail2011
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1078
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 12:23

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by mainsail2011 »

for information KC-135R 59-1468
User avatar
Bennie
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 16435
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by Bennie »

Oscar01 wrote:No, he's coming straight from US.

The one at Spang was IL ang and came in fromt he east, was planned for Mildenhall, but due to crosswinds, diverted.

Oz
I doubt the above statement is correct as this bird was inbound from the (South)East. Unless the US are to the East of Germany nowadays.... :lol:
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
User avatar
Bennie
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 16435
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by Bennie »

Further visitors: DUKE08 & DUKE59 (in close trail).
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
jreijmer
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1021
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 10:25
Type of spotter: F1
Subscriber Scramble: Jeroen van Reijmersdal
Location: Bemmel

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by jreijmer »

59-1468 arrived on Monday morning from the US and was not present yesterday evening when I was at ETNG. So I guess it went somewhere else (Spangdahlem/Koln?) and arrived this morning for duties.

BR,
Jeroen
Oscar01
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2886
Joined: 24 Feb 2003, 11:26
Location: Ede

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by Oscar01 »

Ok, big mix up everybody?

The one at Spang arrived yesterday from the east and was IL ANG 59-1466. This one was still present at Spang this morning and has nothing to do in this topic (basicly).

RCH830 was according to SBS 59-1468 and came, again according to SBS, from the USA yesterday morning (logged via Canada, UK, to Germany). It was not seen on sbs later that day or this morning. It was not seen at Spang this morning, nor at Ramstein.

Hope this helps....
Oz
User avatar
Bennie
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 16435
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by Bennie »

FAF6410 should have visited today (Still on the ground?).
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
ypenburg63
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 211
Joined: 05 Oct 2009, 00:54
Type of spotter: F1
Subscriber Scramble: ypenburg63

Re: ETNG 08-04-2014 MIL

Post by ypenburg63 »

Who can help us with the info concerning the KC-135R 59-1468? It flew to the east in the early morning of the 7th of april. Due runwayworks at Geilenkirchen it diverted to ???? No Ramstein or Spangdahlem. Also no signs from Mildenhall. Anyone who knows where the tanker flew to? Could it be Orland, a FOB for the NATO AWACS???
Post Reply

Return to “Geilenkirchen”